Skip to main content

Review: Audeze iSine 10



Short version: It's a headphone in disguise.

First thing to notice, the comfort was actually better than I thought.
I used a Sony XBA-A3 for two years and it was always a pain in the ass putting those on. The iSine at first seems equally hard to get along with, but after several practices, I found out that it was actually easier to wear on, and once it's there, it stays there.

Sound wise, it's true about two rumors about them:

  • The Soundstage
They have the largest soundstage I've ever heard on IEMs this price, or even double the price. In fact, I would rank their soundstage close to HD600. Just a tad behind HD700.

  • Clarity:
 I really think that objectively having an astonishingly low THD really translates to subjective listening experience. These sound really, really clear. The transients, the vocals, the drums, the snares sound so vivid and transparent. I would say that coming from these little things to full-sized dynamic headphones like HD700 you'd feel like the sound is rather veiled. Dynamic headphones don't have that kind of cleanness when music gets complicated. I would say these iSine 10 are lacking veil in sound overall compared to Denon D5000 and even HD700. Even the HD800S being not amped properly can lose to these little things in clarity, cleanness and bass texture.

  • Compared to XBA-A3
The iSine 10 produces a much larger soundstage than the A3s, with better bass articulation & quantity. The A3 wins in timbre and tonality however, sounding more natural and organic overall.

The iSine 20 has a bit better bass & imaging, yet it only feels like a $99 difference. The iSine 10 & 20 are really close in performance, put into numbers, it may feel like about 10% of difference. For portable use, I think iSine 10 would be sufficient.

  • Cipher cable
One thing that I don't agree with others is about the Cipher cable. I don't like the sound of the Cipher cable. It seems to me that there's some kind of DSP inside which compensates for the tonality, and although that results in a more balanced sound signature, it actually messes up the dynamic range. I actually preferred using 3.5mm straight from my smartphone to the Cipher cable.
The iSine 10 is pretty easy to drive. Feeding them with a Mojo and you'll have a listening experience that's comparable to headphones with a desktop rig .



Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison Review: Massdrop Cavalli Tube Hybrid Amp, Jotunheim

Here's my comparison between the Massdrop Cavalli Tube Hybrid (MCTH) and Schiit Jotunheim (Jot), arriving at 30 hours of burn-in. Using Gumby Gen 5, I was using balanced from Gumby to Jot and SE from Gumby to MCTH. I’ve been mainly listening through HD650 & HD800S. 1. Pairing with HD650 (connected via SE 1/4” plug) Starting with HD650, the sound from MCTH is very organic and lively. Having been using SS amps all these years, (Asgard, O2, Jotunheim) there's an immediate sensation of sweetness & smoothness on first listening to MCTH. Vocals are incredibly real and full of emotions, emanating waves of sonic pleasures into the space around my head. The bass was a tad soft but in a very relaxing way. One could easily float in this pool of music, liquid music and forget about anything else. Plugging into the Jot, the whole sound signature changes. As if woken up from a dream, everything became more transparent and imminent. The leading edges of sound from diffe
Read more

Review: Schiit Gungnir Multibit (USB Gen 5)

Got my Gumby (Gungnir Multibit) for a few days. I have a Chord Mojo and a Nuforce DAC-80 and I thought I’d compare Gumby with them so that it might help people who are also interested in these DACs. The comparison between the three DACs is based on using Jotunheim’s amp section into stock HD800S. (Gumby is running XLR input to Jotunheim, others are via RCA) Soundstage & Imaging: Mojo has a relatively small soundstage, its imaging is quite accurate but feels congested inside its soundstage. DAC80 has a larger soundstage with an excellent imaging ability. It creates a 3D-like experience. Gumby has a soundstage about the same width as DAC80, yet with deeper depth. It creates a more holographic experience. More on this later. Micro-detail: Mojo is not capable of reproducing every last detail. DAC80 is significantly better than Mojo and obviously brings out a lot of details. Listening to DAC80 the first time brought out a lot of “Ah” moments for me. Gumby has the s
Read more

Review: NuForce DAC-80

I started from using a NuForce uDAC-2 and later on upgraded to a Taiwanese brand DAC/AMP combo called DA&T U1s which costs about $400. Recently I've acquired a Chord Mojo and even though Mojo is intended to be a portable DAC/AMP, I found that the DAC portion is somehow better than the one in my U1s. (And of course WAY better than uDAC-2) I've been using the Mojo as a reference DAC for a while and became curious about how a well built dedicated DAC would sound like. After getting one for over half an year of listening, I can say that the DAC-80 is clearly better and offers a balanced sound all around. I'm using an HD800S through Jotunheim and the soundstage really opens up coming from Mojo to DAC-80. Instruments are more realistic in the recordings, especially piano and strings. Vocals tend to get hot because of the treble spike on HD800S, but on the DAC-80 it feels more relaxed and well placed in space. I even found out that a certain sound which I always consid
Read more